Bug#901015: transition: protobuf
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:41 AM Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 10:21:41 +0200
> =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= <gcs@debian.org> wrote:
> > The new protobuf -> protobuf-c / grpc chain compiles now on all
> > release architectures. Due to the mentioned protobuf soname change, I
> > have to restart building of all other dependent packages. I'll be off
> > the grid for the weekend, but will do it next week.
>
> Any update on this?
Indeed, missed to post the results. I'm not at home, all I write is
from my head only. I've build tested all the protobuf reverse
dependencies.
About two packages fail for other reasons and those are already
reported as an RC bug. Four packages fail due to protobuf changes and
three of those already reported by you and have an upstream patch.
I've tested those and their build now works.
The last package which fails is gazebo which seems to be team
maintained but it has two NMUs already. There's no bug reported here
for the protobuf update but upstream aware of it and has a patch[1].
This one is not yet tested by me, but the upstream BTS contains a
comment that's a working fix for gazebo 7.x and the original bug
report[2] states that the fix is in place for the 8.x and 9.x versions
as well. If you have time, please file a bug for this to the gazeboo
source package - but as noted its Debian maintainers are not very
active.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo/pull-request/2984
[2] https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo/issues/2483/gazebo-compilation-broken-with-protobuf-36
Reply to: