[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#898154: marked as done (RM: singularity-container -- RoST; unsupportable in a stable release)



Your message dated Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:36:24 +0000
with message-id <E1feG2S-000Dgi-PV@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#898154: Removed package(s) from stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #898154,
regarding RM: singularity-container -- RoST; unsupportable in a stable release
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
898154: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi

This was agreed with the singularity-container maintainers after a
short offlist discussion regarding the security issues in
singularity-container recently fixed in newer versions
singularity-container in stable could not be supported security-wise
(The patches cannot be easily isolated, upstream will not label the
respective commits for downstream use).

The security team and Afif Elghraoui (afif) and Yaroslav Halchenko
(yoh) came to the conclusion that for Stretch the best course of
action is to remove singularity-container from stable on next point
release time.

It's yet open what to do for buster, if the situation will not improve
before the freeze, likely a RC bug will be filled to keep it out of
testing (although from maintainer point of views it is desired to be
able to keep the backports available, and thus the need to have the
package in testing first).

Please remove singularity-container on next stretch point release.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from stable:

singularity-container |      2.2-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

------------------- Reason -------------------
RoST; unsupportable in a stable release
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 898154@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/898154

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Archive Administrator (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: