[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#892505: marked as done (transition: openexr)

Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:41:38 +0200
with message-id <87d0wcgp19.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#892505: transition: openexr
has caused the Debian Bug report #892505,
regarding transition: openexr
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
892505: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892505
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, malat@debian.org

Dear Release Team,

I'm filing this bug for a new transition of openexr package.

On March 8, 2018 a fixed testing-purpose package (2.2.1-2) has been
uploaded to experimental.

So, following the auto-openexr checklist[1], here is the list of source
packages depending on openexr and the results of the test builds
(honoring the dependency levels as reported in the checklist, as
relevant for the correct order):

### Dependency level 2 ###
 * aqsis_1.8.2-8 => OK
 * darktable_2.4.0-1 => OK
 * exactimage_1.0.1-1 => OK
 * freeimage_3.17.0+ds1-5 => OK
 * gegl_0.3.28-2 => OK
 * imagemagick_8:6.9.9.34+dfsg-3 => OK
 * kde-runtime_4:17.08.3-1 => OK
 * kimageformats_5.42.0-2 => OK
 * kio-extras_4:17.08.3-2 => OK
 * krita_1:3.3.3+dfsg-1 => OK
 * libvigraimpex_1.10.0+git20160211.167be93+dfsg-5 => OK
 * luminance-hdr_2.5.1+dfsg-3 => OK
 * mia_2.4.6-2 => OK
 * nvidia-texture-tools_2.0.8-1+dfsg-8.1 => OK
 * opencv_3.2.0+dfsg-4 => OK
 * openexr-viewers_1.0.1-6 => OK
 * openvdb_5.0.0-1 => OK
 * povray_1:3.7.0.4-2 => OK

### Dependency level 3 ###
 * gmic_1.7.9+zart-4 => FTBFS (not openexr related)
 * gst-plugins-bad1.0_1.8.3-1 => FTBFS (not openexr related)
 * hugin_2018.0.0+dfsg-1 => OK
 * k3d_0.8.0.6-6 => OK
 * openimageio_1.8.9~dfsg0-1 => OK
 * pfstools_2.1.0-3 => OK
 * synfig_1.0.2-1 => OK
 * vips_8.4.5-1 => FTBFS (not openexr related)

### Dependency level 4 ###
  blender_2.79+dfsg0-3 => OK

Thanks for your time and patience.

mfv


[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openexr.html

Ben file:

title = "openexr";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libopenexr22" | .depends ~ "libopenexr23";
is_good = .depends ~ "libopenexr23";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libopenexr22";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers buildd-unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2018-03-11 at 13:38 (+0100), Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2018-03-11 at 00:33 (+0100), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Good, that means this can be a 'smooth' transition, i.e. the new library package
>> can migrate while keeping the old one in testing at the same time, so the two
>> packages that fail to build are not really blockers (they are in order to finish
>> the transition, but they are not in order to move the rest of the packages to
>> testing). Thus please go ahead.
>
> Uploaded. Thanks.

The transition has completed already.

Thus, closing (as requested by Emilio on IRC).

-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: