Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5
Emilio, Seb,
Can you confirm that now that we have
a) "green light" on the transition, and
b) the r-base package is in unstable
we should see binary: any packages being rebuilt -- which I do not yet
see. When will this start?
On 31 May 2018 at 05:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 31 May 2018 at 09:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| | On 31/05/18 00:13, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | >
| | > On 30 May 2018 at 23:40, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| | > | curl migrated to testing today. Please go ahead with R 3.5.
| | >
| | > Yay!! Thank you -- and r-base_3.5.0-3 is now in incoming awaiting inclusion
| | > into unstable.
| |
| | Cool, it's almost built everywhere now.
| |
| | There are a few architectures where it can't built due to openjdk though.
| | I see you changed the build-dependency to:
| |
| | openjdk-10-jdk | default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386]
|
| Yes, that was the most recent bug report on it to reflect Java 10.
|
| | The buildds only take into account the first alternative, but since they don't
| | have openjdk-10 they can't build r-base. One option is to put the architecture
| | list in the first part, e.g. by swapping the order:
| |
| | default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] | openjdk-10-jdk
| |
| | default-jdk defaults to openjdk-10 in most architectures, so that's fine.
| | It will also help with m68k which defaults to openjdk-9 at the moment (I
| | guess it will be updated once openjdk-10 is bootstrapped there).
| |
| | Can you update that?
|
| Very interesting. That had never been suggested. I will give that shot.
| The r-cran-rjava package will need it too.
Uploaded as r-base_3.5.0-4
We have the annual "R in Finance" conference I co-organize for its 10th year
this weekend so I likely won't get to manual uploads of binary: all packages
for a few days.
Dirk
| Dirk
|
| | Thanks,
| | Emilio
|
| --
| http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org
|
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org
Reply to: