Bug#894159: transition: icu
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:36 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> On 01/05/18 19:29, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > OK, the fresh transition testing is the following.
> Alright, let's do this.
I was off the grid on the weekend, but a quick summary how it goes.
ICU -> icu-le-hb -> ICU with Paragraph Layout compiled successfully on all
of our primary architectures. But harfbuzz had to be binNMUed as well. On
sparc64 harfbuzz FTBFS for a while (since last October) and this
architecture won't make the transition. :(
Then openttd was binNMUed too quick, please reschedule that strictly with
icu >= 60.2-6 package version.
I don't see if texlive-bin was binNMUed, you might have missed that. Please
start that.
Unfortunately chromium browser FTBFS on armhf since this January and will
not be able to migrate to testing due to this.
haskell-pandoc-citeproc is an other package which will be unable to migrate
as one of its build dependency, panadoc FTBFS on armel and armhf.
frog FTBFS as it needs a transitioned ucto which is done now. Please
reschedule its binNMU. Note that it will fail on hurd-i386 as while ucto is
built on this architecture, it's not uploaded even to the archives.
qt4-x11 doesn't show up in the automatic ICU transition list and it FTBFS
with it. The bug reporter also supplied a working fix[1]. Maintainer may
upload the fixed package version tomorrow.
Last but not least I've a different understanding (again) of package
transitions with Adrian Bunk. He reassigned #898465 [2] to ICU, when both
related bugreports of ncmpcpp [3] and viking due to mapnik [4] are due to
partial upgrades (shown in the package versions 0.8.1-1 and 3.0.20+ds-1
respectively that these are _not_ the binNMUed ones). Checking the build
logs show mapnik and ncmpcpp rebuilt normally and I've even tested those
correctly. The bug reporters need to do a full packages upgrade, that's all.
Then the migration script knows about dependencies and will not let icu
enter testing by itself, only with the transitioned dependencies. Please
tell me if I'm might be wrong, otherwise I plan to close these bug reports.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/898542#27
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/898465#22
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/898369#5
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/898465#5
Reply to: