[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#894159: OpenTTD, icu and ParagraphLayout



Hi László,

> > First off: I have a pending new upstream version of OpenTTD that I'd
> > like to upload, but I don't want to interfere with this transition.
> > Should I hold it off, or do we expect that resolving these issues will
> > take a while and should I just upload it now (and have it build against
> > the current icu version)?
>    The transition will happen soon. I'm re-recompiled almost everything to
> really start it.

> I'm biased a bit. The current OpenTTD version in Sid compiles fine. If you
> can make the package available before upload or can check the compilation
> yourself with the experimental version of ICU then it would be good.
> I think there's still a day or two before the actual transition so I think
> you can upload OpenTTD after the mentioned test above.
I just compiled the new OpenTTD version against libicu60 from
experimental and that compiles fine. At first glance, internationalized
word-wrapping and right-to-left text looks fine (though I don't read any
such language, the results seem identical to what icu57 produced, modulo
some subtle space changes).

So you're saying I could upload OpenTTD now, and it will be recompiled
with icu60 once that is uploaded to Sid? Or should I wait a few days?

> > Neither me or upstream has much experience in this field, perhaps you
> > have a different suggestion for an alternative?
>   I don't know any other alternative. Only OpenTTD uses the Paragraph Layout
> API and it makes me wonder what other solution the other projects use? I
> may think other games like Lincity-NG[3] also need internationalized text
> placement and/or LibreOffice still need to handle this as well. Do these
> have an alternative solution?

Thanks, we'll have a closer look. I've created a new bug to further
track this, since it seems this will not block this particular
transition. Let's continue discussion here:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897233

Gr.

Matthijs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: