Bug#894159: transition: icu
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
<pochu@debian.org> wrote:
> On 23/04/18 21:19, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> As I remember, 99% of the FTBFS reasons were the icu-config removal,
>> others are the dependent package bugs I've already mentioned. I do not
>> recall any API change. In short, there are fifteen packages FTBFS and
>> all is due to the icu-config removal. This is true for the date of my
>> previous mail. There were several dependent packages upload since
>> then, but I think the situation remained the same.
>
> In that case I'm ok with removing icu-config, but please don't entangle that
> with the SONAME bump. That is, reintroduce icu-config so we can have an easy
> transition, and once the transition is finished, then you are free to drop
> icu-config. Sounds good?
I do agree and open to do an other compilation test of the dependent
packages with icu-config being available.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
Reply to: