[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#886294: marked as done (transition: nodejs)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:05:53 +0100
with message-id <a07a0866-4cb9-4ac6-c976-00ede54acec9@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#886294: transition: nodejs
has caused the Debian Bug report #886294,
regarding transition: nodejs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
886294: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886294
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

nodejs 8.9.3 brings the following improvements for debian:
- a backported openssl 1.1.0 compatibility from nodejs 9.x branch
- hard-to-debug segmentation faults fix (#878674)
- it is an upstream LTS branch

Julien Puydt and me checked all direct reverse build-deps and i
took care of several issues that appeared with the update:
- test failures caused by the move to openssl 1.1.0
- failures caused by exception names changes in assert module
- failures caused by api that was deprecated long ago then dropped

There was no major issue with pure javascript modules and
addons depending on nodejs-abi were rebuilt smoothly after the fixes.

Thank you for your attention,
Jérémy


Ben file:

title = "nodejs";
is_affected = .depends ~ "nodejs-abi-48" | .depends ~ "nodejs-abi-57";
is_good = .depends ~ "nodejs-abi-57";
is_bad = .depends ~ "nodejs-abi-48";

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 25/02/18 10:51, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2018-01-30 20:31 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
> 
>> On 29/01/18 20:15, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-25 11:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>>> Bumping the baseline to z196 looks like the easiest way and as you said,
>>>> it would also fix go, rustc and maybe more software. However we
>> discussed
>>>> raising the ISA to z10 about one year and a half ago, and the conclusion
>>>> was that we still have users with older machines. I'll try to restart
>>>> the discussion again.
>>>
>>> What's the venue to have this discussion in? :)
>>
>> debian-s390@l.d.o ?
>>
>> FWIW you two (Philipp and Aurelien) are the two current s390x porters, so I
>> think it's mostly your call.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> now that this issue has been solved, it seems nodejs is ready for migration
> to testing.

node-mapnik was re-uploaded, which reset the migration delay. I urgented it and
nodejs and the rest of the node modules migrated to testing.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: