Sorry for the delay,
As I said on IRC: please provide an automated list of required binNMUs, like the
On 11/02/18 14:28, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> On 02/10/2018 09:26 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 20:45:44 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30/01/18 08:54, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>>>>> This would also be very helpful for fixing security issue #888777.
>>>>
>>>> You need to talk to the wanna-build team if you want to be able to
>> schedule
>>>> binNMUs for your language rebuilds, just like the ocaml and haskell
>> teams do.
>>>>
>>> FWIW I disagree, I think this is something the wanna-build team has
>>> essentially delegated to release, so getting people on board is a shared
>>> thing between those two teams rather than solely a w-b thing. It
>>> happens once every few years though so there isn't really a process to
>>> vet people.
>>
>> So can we have an opinion on the current proposal, which is a single DD
>> (stapelberg)? As far as I know DSA's ticket is currently blocked on this.
>>
>
> nit: there’s no blocked ticket, but rather, once debian-release is okay
> with the proposal, someone would need to file a ticket on my behalf. See my
> other reply upthread:
>
>> Hector Oron pointed out in the Debian RT that the release-team should
> give their okay before the PostgreSQL account can be created. This should
> be done by way of the release team filing the Debian RT ticket on my
> behalf, preferable as an inline signed email.
>
> If I understand https://www.debian.org/intro/organization correctly,
> then pochu@ should be able to make this call. Given that no objections have
> been voiced by anyone involved within the last two weeks since I asked for
> access, may I suggest to go ahead? Thank you!
haskell one, so that if at some point you can't handle them for some time,
others (e.g. me) can easily schedule them.
Emilio