Bug#882697: stretch-pu: package apparmor/2.11.0-3+deb9u1
- To: 882697@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#882697: stretch-pu: package apparmor/2.11.0-3+deb9u1
- From: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2018 12:23:40 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 85373hvrnn.fsf@boum.org>
- Reply-to: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, 882697@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1512594224.2484.105.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> (Adam D. Barratt's message of "Wed, 06 Dec 2017 21:03:44 +0000")
- References: <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost> <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost> <1512212798.2278.23.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost> <85po7xqmhv.fsf@boum.org> <1512242519.2278.48.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost> <20171206133125.zntf5srjsia2g6vo@nora.maurer-it.com> <85zi6wj5ho.fsf@boum.org> <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost> <20171206145352.scgbb77dll75kjm2@nora.maurer-it.com> <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost> <85efo7g2t4.fsf@boum.org> <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost> <85wp1zd8so.fsf@boum.org> <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost> <1512594224.2484.105.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <151163895024.25639.11816562461367496713.reportbug@deb.localhost>
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
The issue in Linux 4.14 with feature set pinning vs. mount operations
was not fixed yet so the 2.11.0-3+deb9u1 package that was accepted in
the proposed-updates stable queue is not suitable for Stretch
currently ⇒ dear release team, feel free to reject or delete it if it
helps you ensure it does not land in the next point release.
Also, after some discussion with Fabian the proposed change was
re-implemented slightly differently in testing/sid; I want to do the
same for the Stretch proposed update ⇒ tagging "moreinfo".
I'm not sure if I should remove the "confirmed" and/or "pending" tag
so in doubt I'll leave it to you to do the right thing.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Reply to: