On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 18:42 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 19:33 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > On 18/12/17 13:16, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > Dear release team, > > > > > > We would like to move the new DPDK LTS release 17.11-2 from > > > experimental to unstable. This breaks the various libraries ABI > > > compat, > > > so a transition is needed. > > > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dpdk > > > > > > Reverse build dependency source package: > > > > > > collectd > > > > > > The reverse dependency builds fine with the new version of DPDK > > > without > > > any source changes. Note that it currently FTBS due to a > > > different > > > and > > > unrelated build-dep [1]. Tested by disabling that other plugin > > > and > > > rebuilding with the new DPDK version. > > > > > > The new DPDK packages are all in experimental, having passed the > > > NEW > > > queue, and have built on all supported architectures. > > > > > > Note that from this release we started to follow a boost-like > > > model, so > > > the ABI revision is named after the upstream major version (eg: > > > librte- > > > eal3 -> librte-eal17.11). This is done because most libraries > > > built > > > from DPDK break ABI compat on every single major release. > > > > There are no rdeps so no transition tracker... Since you confirm > > the > > only > > build-rdep is fine, please go ahead. > > > > Emilio > > Ah I see, I though reverse-recommends needed a transition as well. > Thanks! The upload to unstable is done. Thanks! -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part