[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#882863: marked as done (stretch-pu: package grok/1.20110708.1-4.3~deb9u1)



Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:46:36 +0000
with message-id <1512816396.1994.30.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing bugs for updates included in stretch point release
has caused the Debian Bug report #882863,
regarding stretch-pu: package grok/1.20110708.1-4.3~deb9u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882863: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882863
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Let's fix the missing dependencies. #875422, #779034
And while we are at it, the pointer aliasing bugfix sounded reasonable
as well. #841668
So this is a rebuild of the sid package with 2 patches removed.
(The gperf patches are not relevant (and not backwards compatible) for
stretch.)

Andreas
diff -Nru grok-1.20110708.1/debian/changelog grok-1.20110708.1/debian/changelog
--- grok-1.20110708.1/debian/changelog	2015-01-16 23:03:19.000000000 +0100
+++ grok-1.20110708.1/debian/changelog	2017-11-27 17:12:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,29 @@
+grok (1.20110708.1-4.3~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Rebuild for stretch.
+  * Drop the gperf 3.1 patches
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>  Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:12:13 +0100
+
+grok (1.20110708.1-4.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * libgrok-dev: Add the missing dependencies on:
+    - libgrok1 (Closes: #875422)
+    - libtokyocabinet-dev (Closes: #779034)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>  Sat, 14 Oct 2017 17:15:19 +0300
+
+grok (1.20110708.1-4.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Apply Steve Langasek's fix for wrong pointer alias bug
+    (Closes: #841668)
+  * Apply patches to allow build grok with gperf >= 3.1
+
+ -- SZALAY Attila <sasa@debian.org>  Wed, 09 Aug 2017 16:36:26 -0400
+
 grok (1.20110708.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru grok-1.20110708.1/debian/control grok-1.20110708.1/debian/control
--- grok-1.20110708.1/debian/control	2012-10-14 11:08:33.000000000 +0200
+++ grok-1.20110708.1/debian/control	2017-10-14 16:15:19.000000000 +0200
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
 Section: libdevel
 Architecture: any
 Depends:
+ libgrok1 (= ${binary:Version}),
+ libtokyocabinet-dev,
  ${misc:Depends},
  ${shlibs:Depends},
 Provides: libgrok-dev
diff -Nru grok-1.20110708.1/debian/patches/fix-wrong-pointer-alias grok-1.20110708.1/debian/patches/fix-wrong-pointer-alias
--- grok-1.20110708.1/debian/patches/fix-wrong-pointer-alias	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ grok-1.20110708.1/debian/patches/fix-wrong-pointer-alias	2017-08-09 21:27:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+From: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@ubuntu.com>
+Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000
+X-Dgit-Generated: 1.20110708.1-4.1 7fc1ec5f57e2299be6b1248db82da42f569c6ab0
+Subject: fix wrong pointer alias
+
+
+---
+
+--- grok-1.20110708.1.orig/grok_pattern.c
++++ grok-1.20110708.1/grok_pattern.c
+@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ int grok_pattern_add(const grok_t *grok,
+ }
+ 
+ int grok_pattern_find(const grok_t *grok, const char *name, size_t name_len,
+-                      const char **regexp, size_t *regexp_len) {
++                      const char **regexp, int *regexp_len) {
+   TCTREE *patterns = grok->patterns;
+-  *regexp = tctreeget(patterns, name, name_len, (int*) regexp_len);
++  *regexp = tctreeget(patterns, name, name_len, regexp_len);
+ 
+   grok_log(grok, LOG_PATTERNS, "Searching for pattern '%s' (%s): %.*s",
+            name, *regexp == NULL ? "not found" : "found", *regexp_len, *regexp);
+--- grok-1.20110708.1.orig/grok_pattern.h
++++ grok-1.20110708.1/grok_pattern.h
+@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ TCLIST *grok_pattern_name_list(const gro
+ int grok_pattern_add(const grok_t *grok, const char *name, size_t name_len,
+                       const char *regexp, size_t regexp_len);
+ int grok_pattern_find(const grok_t *grok, const char *name, size_t name_len,
+-                      const char **regexp, size_t *regexp_len);
++                      const char **regexp, int *regexp_len);
+ int grok_patterns_import_from_file(const grok_t *grok, const char *filename);
+ int grok_patterns_import_from_string(const grok_t *grok, const char *buffer);
+ 
+--- grok-1.20110708.1.orig/grokre.c
++++ grok-1.20110708.1/grokre.c
+@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static char *grok_pattern_expand(grok_t
+     int start, end, matchlen;
+     const char *pattern_regex;
+     int patname_len;
+-    size_t regexp_len;
++    int regexp_len;
+     int pattern_regex_needs_free = 0;
+ 
+     grok_log(grok, LOG_REGEXPAND, "% 20s: %.*s", "start of loop",
+--- grok-1.20110708.1.orig/test/grok_pattern.test.c
++++ grok-1.20110708.1/test/grok_pattern.test.c
+@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
+ void test_grok_pattern_add_and_find_work(void) {
+   INIT;
+   const char *regexp = NULL;
+-  size_t len = 0;
++  int len = 0;
+ 
+   grok_pattern_add(&grok, "WORD", 5, "\\w+", 3);
+   grok_pattern_add(&grok, "TEST", 5, "TEST", 4);
diff -Nru grok-1.20110708.1/debian/patches/series grok-1.20110708.1/debian/patches/series
--- grok-1.20110708.1/debian/patches/series	2015-01-16 23:04:43.000000000 +0100
+++ grok-1.20110708.1/debian/patches/series	2017-11-27 17:12:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 0001-Support-GNU-kFreeBSD-add-necessary-linker-flag.patch
 0002-Support-GNU-Hurd-add-necessary-linker-flag.patch
 pcre-group-name.patch
+fix-wrong-pointer-alias

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 9.3

Hi,

Each of the updates referenced in these bugs was included in this
morning's stretch point release. Thanks!

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: