Bug#878685: stretch-pu: package udftools/1.3-2
On Saturday 18 November 2017 20:13:14 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 17:59 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 12:17 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Thursday 02 November 2017 21:55:54 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 29 October 2017 18:19:53 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > > Please prepare an upload built and tested on stable, using
> > > > > "stretch" as
> > > > > the changelog distribution, and versioned as either 1.3-
> > > > > 1+deb9u1
> > > > > or
> > > > > 1.3-2~deb9u1, depending on how the changelog is structured, and
> > > > > attach
> > > > > the debdiff to this bug log.
> > > >
> > > > Ok. I uploaded package version 1.3-2~deb9u1 to mentors, it is
> > > > there:
> > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/udftools
> > > >
> > > > debdiff between current version in stretch and 1.3-2~deb9u1 is
> > > > attached.
> > >
> > > Can you review it?
> >
> > It will be, when someone next goes through the stable-new queue.
> >
> > > According to highvoltage comment, Package has been uploaded to
> > > Debian,
> >
> > Correct. However, it preferably shouldn't have been, because the
> > upload wasn't agreed yet; CCing the uploader.
>
> I was hoping there'd have been a follow-up there. Ho hum.
CCed Jonathan have not responded. I was waiting too...
> > Particularly, I'd have pointed out that the changelog is illogical -
> > it should either be 1.3-1, then the 1.3-2 unstable changes, then 1.3-
> > 2~deb9u1, or 1.3-1 then 1.3-1+deb9u1.
>
> I'm not going to bother with a reject-and-reupload cycle this time, but
> please don't assume that won't happen in future. This:
>
> +udftools (1.3-2~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=low
> +
> + * Fix path to pktsetup in udftools init script
> +
> + -- Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:41:57 +0200
> +
> udftools (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> is simply wrong.
Ok, I would like to ask, which version to choose if uploaded package is
exactly same as version X in unstable? As in unstable is version 1.3-2 I
chose that suffix ~deb9u1. But I have not found any details about this
situation in any debian manual.
> Flagged for acceptance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
Reply to: