[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#851823: marked as done (Changing default emacs to 25 to allow emacs24 removal -- RoM)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 16:59:57 +0200
with message-id <400c9034-9430-db2c-0906-26092c8c76b9@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Changing default emacs to 25 to allow emacs24 removal -- RoM
has caused the Debian Bug report #851823,
regarding Changing default emacs to 25 to allow emacs24 removal -- RoM
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
851823: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851823
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org

We want to remove emacs24 from stretch, and we think we've managed to
fix all of the affected packages[1].  We're consulting you because we
thought this might be considered a transition, though perhaps a minor
one relative to others.

At this point, we believe we only need to upload a version of
emacs-defaults that switches the emacs and emacs-nox metapackages from
24 to 25.

Would that be acceptable?  If so, we'll upload, and then file the
ftp.debian.org RM emacs24 bug.

According to "dak rm -Rn emacs24", the emacs and emacs-nox metapackages
are indeed the only broken depends.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Emacs25InStretch

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:15:48 -0600 Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
wrote:
> We want to remove emacs24 from stretch, and we think we've managed to
> fix all of the affected packages[1].  We're consulting you because we
> thought this might be considered a transition, though perhaps a minor
> one relative to others.
> 
> At this point, we believe we only need to upload a version of
> emacs-defaults that switches the emacs and emacs-nox metapackages from
> 24 to 25.

This hasn't happened in stretch, but was done for buster and sid.

> Would that be acceptable?  If so, we'll upload, and then file the
> ftp.debian.org RM emacs24 bug.

Please take care of the emacs24 removal ;-)


Andreas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: