[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#869854: marked as done (nmu: restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 on armel)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 14:03:32 +0100
with message-id <20170806130332.n4tsvcplph3gdskv@powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#869854: nmu: restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 on armel
has caused the Debian Bug report #869854,
regarding nmu: restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 on armel
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
869854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869854
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello,

It looks like it was restbed rebuilt on all architectures except armel.
Ring,which depends on restbed, fails to build on armel. I could
reproduce the build failure on a porter box. Then I rebuilt restbed and
it solved the issue.

This is my first time doing this:

nmu restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ssl1.1'

Cheers <3

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 02:10:24AM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> It looks like it was restbed rebuilt on all architectures except armel.
> Ring,which depends on restbed, fails to build on armel. I could
> reproduce the build failure on a porter box. Then I rebuilt restbed and
> it solved the issue.
> 
> This is my first time doing this:
> 
> nmu restbed-4.0~dfsg1-4 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ssl1.1'

I don't think this is related to libssl1.1 - restbed on armel already
depends on it. The version skew is because it was previously not building
on armel, and 42 days ago it did start to build (versus 231 days for the
other arches). So it was not necessary to rebuild on armel for libssl1.1.

However, since your testing clearly shows a rebuild fixing the problem,
I've scheduled that. I suspect some other change further up the
dependencies.

Thanks,


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

--- End Message ---
Reply to: