Bug#851250: marked as done (transition: mysql-5.7)
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:47:24 +0100
with message-id <d124beab-de6d-2fb0-f225-b461bdf4447d@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#851250: transition: mysql-5.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #851250,
regarding transition: mysql-5.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
851250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851250
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
please set up a tracker for the mysql-5.6 to mysql-5.7 transition. Even
if mysql-5.7 won't go to testing, it will be good to see if mysql-5.6
(and thus libmysqlclient18) can be removed from unstable.
Ben file:
title = "mysql-5.7";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient[12]/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient20/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libmysqlclient1/;
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 13/01/17 12:36, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2017-01-13 12:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> That tracker is bad. We already have:
>>
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mariadb.html
>
> Ideally that tracker would go all-green at some point and the proposed
> mysql-5.7 tracker would be empty (except for mysql-x.y) in that case.
> But as it was discussed there might be packages explicitly requiring the
> oracle implementation - they would always be red in the mariadb tracker
> without distinguishing between good (-5.7) and bad (-5.6).
mysql-5.6 is gone from testing and sid. Let's close this.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: