[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#853245: marked as done (RM: virglrenderer/0.5.0-2)



Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:28:40 +0100
with message-id <9cb5bd40-0937-39ef-eca6-3f96433fac1e@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#853245: RM: virglrenderer/0.5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #853245,
regarding RM: virglrenderer/0.5.0-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
853245: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853245
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi

Please remove virglrenderer from testing. virglrenderer has security
bugs and is in meanwhile orpahned, and should not be included in
stretch as stable release. The only reverse dependency previously
using it was qemu, but qemu reverted the support for "enable virtio
gpu (virglrenderer) and opengl support" with the 1:2.8+dfsg-2 upload
to unstable.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 30/01/17 20:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> 
> Hi
> 
> Please remove virglrenderer from testing. virglrenderer has security
> bugs and is in meanwhile orpahned, and should not be included in
> stretch as stable release. The only reverse dependency previously
> using it was qemu, but qemu reverted the support for "enable virtio
> gpu (virglrenderer) and opengl support" with the 1:2.8+dfsg-2 upload
> to unstable.

Hinted for removal.

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: