Bug#849488: Bug#847575: closed by Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org> (no embedded dietlibc)
- To: 849488@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
- Subject: Bug#849488: Bug#847575: closed by Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org> (no embedded dietlibc)
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:22:47 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1483737767.7032.57.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Reply-to: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 849488@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1482950205.22890.21.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- References: <87r350dg21.fsf@msgid.hilluzination.de> <148129767598.21757.10764676696969364452.reportbug@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <handler.847575.D847575.148236250427584.notifdone@bugs.debian.org> <1482364663.2677.2.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20161222034933.mvt6bnh7rzlfxyw7@thunk.org> <1482841012.3983.4.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20161227173103.kyk6ufl6o4ykh5tu@thunk.org> <1482868596.22890.13.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <1482950205.22890.21.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 18:36 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [recipient list trimmed and sent to the release.d.o bug rather than the
> e2fsprogs one]
>
> On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 19:56 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...]
> > On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 12:31 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> [...]
> > > Agreed, that seems to be the best way to handle things. So that means
> > > we would need to do a binNMU for e2fsck-static/1.42.12-2 for the
> > > following architectures:
> > >
> > > alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc
> > >
> > > I've reassigned this to the release team to see if the Stable Release
> > > Managers agree (which hopefully they will).
> >
> > Only three of those architectures - amd64, i386 and powerpc - are in
> > stable so are the only ones that are relevant as far as the release.d.o
> > bug is concerned. I've scheduled binNMUs for those; you'll have to
> > handle the others separately, or explain which Debian architectures you
> > actually meant (for instance, "arm" hasn't been used as a Debian
> > architecture name for several releases now).
>
> Are binNMUs for any other architectures in stable required?
Answer came there none. However, I noticed that the libraries produced
by e2fsprogs are multi-arch:same, so I scheduled binNMUs for all
architectures in jessie, which have now been flagged for acceptance into
p-u.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: