[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pbseqlib testing migration



I'd like to follow-up on this. I will try for an executive summary in
case my original message was too long:

* pbseqlib builds three arch:any libraries as well as the arch:all
libpbseq-dev that depends on all of their -dev packages

* pbseqlib has a new build dependency that does not build on 32-bit
architectures (all old pbseqlib binaries have already been removed)

* the un-installability of libpbseq-dev on i386 is preventing testing
migration.

I believe this needs a force-hint. This is also somewhat urgent because
some rdeps with fixed RC bugs cannot migrate without this one going first.

Thanks and regards
Afif

على السبت 31 كانون الأول 2016 ‫22:59، كتب Afif Elghraoui:
> Hello,
> 
> pbseqlib includes a metapackage (arch:all) to install its component
> sub-libraries and development files (arch:any). Since its new dependency
> pbbam is not available on 32-bit architectures, this metapackage is not
> installable on i386 anymore. Testing migration appears to be blocked
> because of this, even though the metapackage would not be new to Stretch:
> 
> ~~~ https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pbseqlib
> 11 days old (needed 10 days)
> libpbseq/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpbdata (>= 0~20161219-1)
> libpbseq/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpbihdf (>= 0~20161219-1)
> libpbseq/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libblasr (>= 0~20161219-1)
> libpbseq-dev/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpbdata-dev (>= 0~20161219-1)
> libpbseq-dev/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libpbihdf-dev (>= 0~20161219-1)
> libpbseq-dev/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libblasr-dev (>= 0~20161219-1)
> Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/p/pbseqlib.html
> Valid candidate
> ~~~
> 
> Does this situation need a force hint? We need this to migrate in order
> to prevent autoremoval of several other packages.
> 
> Thanks and regards
> Afif
> 

-- 
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name


Reply to: