[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#850183: marked as done (stretch-ignore tag for RC bug #844134 against scilab)



Your message dated Wed, 4 Jan 2017 20:19:44 +0100
with message-id <b008d6f8-d4e7-9607-302a-cf5002158107@debian.org>
and subject line Re: stretch-ignore tag for RC bug #844134 against scilab
has caused the Debian Bug report #850183,
regarding stretch-ignore tag for RC bug #844134 against scilab
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
850183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850183
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi Release Team,

Would you agree to tag #844134 (scilab segfaults with TSX) stretch-ignore since TSX is about to be disabled for stretch [1][2]?

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844134#32
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850182

Many thanks in advance,

_g.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 20:13:14 +0100 Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi Release Team,
> 
> Would you agree to tag #844134 (scilab segfaults with TSX) stretch-ignore since TSX is about to be disabled for stretch [1][2]?
> 
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844134#32
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850182

Oops, severity of #844134 has just been downgraded to 'normal'.
Closing this request.
Sorry about the noise.

_g.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: