Bug#883533: marked as done (nmu: db5.3, tcl8.6, libjpeg-turbo, wayland, fftw3, nspr, libgudev, tk8.6)
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:55:06 +0100
with message-id <90aca728-9e21-9636-2a69-d7a5b0caa6ef@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#883533: nmu: db5.3, tcl8.6, libjpeg-turbo, wayland, fftw3, nspr, libgudev, tk8.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #883533,
regarding nmu: db5.3, tcl8.6, libjpeg-turbo, wayland, fftw3, nspr, libgudev, tk8.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
883533: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
I would like to ask for binNMUing 8 packages. All of them happen to be
+b1 for mips64el and "normal" for all other architectures. Fixing these
resolves all binNMU-induced skews affecting dependency satisfaction of
source packages with popcon of at least 8000, so this limited set has a
noticeable impact to cross build QA. I hope I got the wanna-build
invocation right:
nmu db5.3_5.3.28-13.1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
nmu tcl8.6_8.6.7+dfsg-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
nmu libjpeg-turbo_1:1.5.2-2 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
nmu wayland_1.14.0-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
nmu fftw3_3.3.6p2-2 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
nmu nspr_2:4.16-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
nmu libgudev_232-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
nmu tk8.6_8.6.7-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
Barring errors with binNMU handling of M-A:same packages, I don't expect
to send more of such batches. This is the big fish to me. Most other
skews I am seeing are caused by arch-specific FTBFS. Scheduling them at
low priority is fine. QA will benefit as soon as they hit unstable.
Helmut
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 04/12/17 21:12, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> I would like to ask for binNMUing 8 packages. All of them happen to be
> +b1 for mips64el and "normal" for all other architectures. Fixing these
> resolves all binNMU-induced skews affecting dependency satisfaction of
> source packages with popcon of at least 8000, so this limited set has a
> noticeable impact to cross build QA. I hope I got the wanna-build
> invocation right:
>
> nmu db5.3_5.3.28-13.1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
> nmu tcl8.6_8.6.7+dfsg-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
> nmu libjpeg-turbo_1:1.5.2-2 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
> nmu wayland_1.14.0-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
> nmu fftw3_3.3.6p2-2 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
> nmu nspr_2:4.16-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
> nmu libgudev_232-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
> nmu tk8.6_8.6.7-1 . ANY -mips64el . -m "unskew multiarch"
>
> Barring errors with binNMU handling of M-A:same packages, I don't expect
> to send more of such batches. This is the big fish to me. Most other
> skews I am seeing are caused by arch-specific FTBFS. Scheduling them at
> low priority is fine. QA will benefit as soon as they hit unstable.
Scheduled.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: