[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#862189: marked as done (transition: hunspell)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:37:45 +0200
with message-id <fa58f612-c4e5-cbc8-6f85-83e356fa986c@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
has caused the Debian Bug report #862189,
regarding transition: hunspell
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
862189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

Simply a "new" upstream.

Ben file:

title = "hunspell";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.4-0" | .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.6-0";
is_good = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.6-0";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libhunspell-1.4-0";

(there's already a auto-hunspell tracker.)

Note newer firefoxes (as in experimental) already seem to need >= 1.6...

Of the packages using hunspell, only lokalize failed (again, no surprise on how they
do the detection), filed #862163.

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 25/06/17 22:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
> 
> On 25/06/17 13:18, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:11:24PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> On 17/06/17 11:29, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> FTR:
>>>>
>>>> >From 2017-05-29:
>>>>
>>>> 12:31 < _rene_> pochu: yeah, I know there's no release yet but I already plan what to do (when) after release and wonder whether I already could get a ACK for hunspell so the LO 5.3.4 upload (to be released the week after the release) can directly be built against it and not need a bin-NMU.. ;)
>>>> 12:33 < _rene_> pochu: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862189. everything builds.
>>>> 12:33 -zwiebelbot:#debian-release- Debian#862189: transition: hunspell - https://bugs.debian.org/862189
>>>> 12:39 < pochu> ack
>>>> 12:40 < _rene_> k, thanks :)
>>>>
>>>> So uploaded now. 
>>>>
>>>> firefox was 54 Build-Depend'ing on it in unstable anyway.
>>>>
>>>> As of https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.4_release
>>>> said LO will be released Thursday. Will upload that one then to save the
>>>> bin-NMU.
>>>
>>> binNMUs scheduled, excluding firefox (bd-uninst) firefox-esr (was waiting for it
>>> to migrate, I'll binNMU it at some point) and libreoffice.
>>
>> firefox-esr migrated, and now has a maintainer upload so hopefully won't
>> need a binNMU. It does not yet build though, because it depends on an
>> unavailable version of libsqlite (so we'll possibly need to transition that
>> when it happens, to unblock this one).
>>
>> Or we could do removals, but that feels a bit ew.
> 
> Given hunspell already migrated to testing, this is not blocking anything, so
> there's no rush to get it finished. Thus there's no need to remove firefox-esr
> (plus any rdeps). This should just sort itself out in due time.

And this got eventually done. Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: