[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#874570: marked as done (nmu: php-facedetect_1.1.0+git20160406-3)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:22:45 +0200
with message-id <b49fe1b1-3893-1bd1-b30a-e1abc9c5c796@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#874570: nmu: php-facedetect_1.1.0+git20160406-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #874570,
regarding nmu: php-facedetect_1.1.0+git20160406-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
874570: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874570
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu php-facedetect_1.1.0+git20160406-3 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against opencv 3.2"

transition in experimental.


Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 09/09/17 13:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> 
> On 2017-09-09 13:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 07/09/17 13:13, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> 
>>> nmu php-facedetect_1.1.0+git20160406-3 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against opencv 3.2"
>>
>> That transition hasn't started in sid yet, so this will be a no-op unless we add
>> some --extra-depends on the new opencv in experimental - something we don't
>> normally do. So I'm just closing this, and we'll deal with these once the opencv
>> transition starts.
> 
> php-facedetect/experimental was built against opencv 3.1 which is now
> cruft in experimental ...
> Since it already B-D libopencv-dev (>= 3), no --extra-depends is needed
> and it will switch to 3.2, so please nmu it in experimental.
> (I tested the rebuild before filing the bug, since I was not sure what
> would happen.)

Aha, you're absolutely right. I didn't check that it was built against 3.1.

Scheduled now.

Thanks,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: