[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#866604: marked as done (stretch-pu: package uwsgi-plugin-php)

Your message dated Sat, 9 Sep 2017 14:58:03 +0200
with message-id <20170909125803.3zkkl4vceko43bsa@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#866604: stretch-pu: package uwsgi-plugin-php
has caused the Debian Bug report #866604,
regarding stretch-pu: package uwsgi-plugin-php
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
866604: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866604
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Dear release team,

I'm hereby asking, if the fix [1] for #853891 [2] would be accepted into
stretch?

Thanks for your work,
Georg


[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-uwsgi/uwsgi.git/commit/?id=cf89be69ac134ebeb14f453f7d915142d276472d
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864743

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Control: tag -1 wontfix

On Tue, Jul  4, 2017 at 12:18:55 +0200, Georg Faerber wrote:

> Hi KiBi,
> 
> On 17-07-01 02:27:41, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I see a bug number mismatch here.
> 
> You're right, copy/paste error on my side..
> 
> > Anyway, you didn't really tell us what works and what doesn't with the
> > package currently in stretch. It's hard to tell whether it's currently
> > totally broken or whether you just need to install some php package
> > alongside it to satisfy other packages's dependencies.
> > 
> > I'd tend to think this pu request is about the latter, but you really
> > should be explaining why you want a change in stable in the first
> > place…
> 
> Sorry for not doing this upfront: 
> 
> - The package in stretch isn't totally broken, actually it works as
>   expected and does a great job.
> 
> - There is just a (minor) annoyance, so your assumption is correct: I
>   would like to serve IcingaWeb2 via uwsgi, that's why I've created
>   #853891 initially: Currently, in a Nginx powered stack, one has to
>   install packages like php7.0-fpm or the (deprecated) fcgiwrap to
>   satisfy the inter-package dependencies. 
>   
> - Adding 'Provides: php', like the patch [1] does, would solve this
>   issue and wouldn't force people into installing software, which they
>   don't need, in this case at least.
> 
> - I think taking this route is much more clean and "the Debian way" than
>   fiddling around via self-made packages, using equivs or something
>   similar.
> 
> - I've rebuilt the package for myself with the patch attached: It does
>   solve the initial problem and works as expected.
> 
> - I think the risk of regression(s) is quite low, given that the patch
>   only touches two lines of Debian code.
> 
Thanks for the extra explanation, this is much helpful.  Unfortunately I
don't think this meets the bar for updates to stable; I wouldn't mind
seeing this lumped in with a fix for a more severe issue in the future,
but on its own I think the bug is minor enough to not bother.  Sorry.

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---
Reply to: