[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#871897: marked as done (transition: directfb)

Your message dated Sun, 3 Sep 2017 19:06:18 +0200
with message-id <caf9b363-f118-02b1-0c5e-5aef8f04c626@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#871897: transition: directfb
has caused the Debian Bug report #871897,
regarding transition: directfb
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
871897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871897
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

libdirectfb bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. The reverse dependencies
build fine against the new version. qingy however FTBFS for unreleated reasons
(#817643)

Cheers

Ben file:

title = "directfb";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libdirectfb-1.2-9" | .depends ~ "libdirectfb-1.7-7";
is_good = .depends ~ "libdirectfb-1.7-7";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libdirectfb-1.2-9";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (650, 'unstable-debug'), (650, 'buildd-unstable'), (650, 'unstable'), (601, 'testing'), (600, 'experimental-debug'), (600, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 03/09/17 17:51, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/09/17 17:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/09/17 10:20, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:19:43PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>>> On 2017-08-15 19:39:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>> libdirectfb bumped its SONAME and needs a transition. The reverse dependencies
>>>>>> build fine against the new version. qingy however FTBFS for unreleated reasons
>>>>>> (#817643)
>>>>>
>>>>> Ack.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, uploaded.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> -- 
>>>> Sebastian Ramacher
>>>
>>> Does this mean that the directfb transition to testing can now be
>>> unblocked?
>>
>> It has been blocked because of the udeb block due to the ongoing d-i release. It
>> will be automatically unblocked once the udeb block is lifted, which should
>> hopefully happen in the next few days.
> 
> In fact it just happened an hour ago, so directfb should migrate in the next
> britney run in a few minutes.

And it's in.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: