On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 07:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 16:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 06:07 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > > > > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (2017-07-01): > > > > src:linux-latest builds meta-packages depending on debug info packages > > > > built from src:linux. During the stretch release cycle, these were > > > > changed to new-style dbgsym packages and then this change was reverted > > > > to src:linux. However, the change in src:linux-latest was *not* > > > > reverted, leaving these meta-packages uninstallable. > > [...] > > -Section: debug > > -Priority: extra > > > > Should the -dbg packages not still be in the "debug" section? > > > > Is it intentional that there are still some dbgsym packages built by > > src:linux? Specifically: > > > > hyperv-daemons-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, i386 > > libcpupower1-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > linux-cpupower-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, i386 > > linux-kbuild-4.9-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > linux-perf-4.9-dbgsym | 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > usbip-dbgsym | 2.0+4.9.30-2+deb9u2 | stable-new | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > Ping, both on the above questions and the upload. > > If this is going to make it into 9.1, it needs to be uploaded _and > through NEW_ by the weekend. I can upload straight away if you're satisfied by the answers I just sent. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Design a system any fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part