Hi, gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> (2017-06-28): > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:51:33 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I haven't matched this to code changes at first glance. For the sake > > of clarity: this relates to the Depends → Recommends update, because > > code was added to “apache2_invoke enmode perl” where needed? > > Thanks for asking; this made me look at the changes again, and made me > realize that I made a mistake (I took only one of Axel's commits between > 2.5.0-4 and 2.5.0-5 but there were actually three). Sorry for that. > > > (The second sentence makes it look like this /was/ the case already, while > > this seems to /become/ the case with this particular upload AFAIUI.) > > The problem in #810655, as I understand it, is that d/control has > libapache2-mod-perl2 in Recommends (which is correct as embperl doesn't > require it) but that embperl's /etc/apache2/mods-available/zembperl.load > unconditionally tried to load mod_perl. > Axel has in a later commit removed the changes in libembperl-perl.postinst > again, after verifying that embperl installs without mod_perl, with mod_perl > installed and activated and with mod_perl installed but disabled. Tests are good. :) > So the only remaining code change is actually: > > #v+ > --- a/debian/zembperl.load.in > +++ b/debian/zembperl.load.in > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > # The sucky "zembperl" name is so we load after perl > > -# Depends: perl > +# Recommends: perl > > <IfModule mod_perl.c> > LoadModule embperl_module @ARCHLIB@/auto/Embperl/Embperl.so > #v- > > > I've now tentatively changed d/changelog to say > > #v+ > * Change hard dependency on mod_perl in zembperl.load to Recommends. > mod_perl is not required, and is enabled by default anyway if it is > installed. > This change matches the package dependencies and fixes an installation > failure when libapache2-mod-perl2 is not installed. > (Closes: #810655) > #v- > > > Does this make sense? I think the situation is clearer with your explanations above, and the changes+changelog look in sync and reasonable. > I'm attaching the full new debdiff, and I'm looping in Axel for a sanity > check. I won't be tagging this bug report with +confirmed right away, since we're awaiting for some more feedback, but the proposed changes look good to me. KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature