[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#863049: jessie-pu: package shutter/0.92-0.1+deb8u2



Control: tag -1 moreinfo

gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> (2017-05-20):
> I've prepared an upload of shutter for stable. The new version
> includes two patches:
> - one fixing CVE-2016-10081 / #849777
> - another one which dod uploaded together with this one as 0.93.1-1.3
>   in January which is also security relevant (replaces
>   system("string") with system(@array)).

That's a long patch… Comments below (see last hunk, mainly).

> +shutter (0.92-0.1+deb8u2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium

As usual, target jessie when uploading.

> ++		system(
> ++            convert =>
> ++            -caption => $text,
> ++            -fill => sprintf( "#%04x%04x%04x%04x",
> ++                              $color->red,
> ++                              $color->green,
> ++                              $color->blue,
> ++                              $stroke_color->get_alpha
> ++                          ),
> ++            $filename,
> ++            -pointsize => $pointsize_sbutton->get_value,
> ++            -gravity => $gravity_combo->get_active_text,
> ++            qw/-bordercolor snow -background black/,
> ++            -polaroid => $angle_sbutton->get_value,
> ++            $tmpfilename
> ++        );

Nice variations on the “how to build a list” topic, thanks for making
sure the release team folks are fluent in Perl.

> ++	#execute imagemagick command
> ++	system(
> ++        convert =>
> ++        -background => '#00000000',

I wasn't sure that worked, but that seems to do the trick; Perl is fun.

> + sub nautilus_sendto {
> + 	my ( $self, $user_data ) = @_;
> +-	system("nautilus-sendto $user_data &");
> ++	system('nautilus-sendto', $user_data);
> + 	if($?){
> + 		my $response = $self->{_dialogs}->dlg_error_message( 
> + 			sprintf( $self->{_d}->get("Error while executing %s."), "'nautilus-sendto'"),

Was the '&' really meant to go away?


KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: