Bug#864379: unblock: pgloader/3.3.2+dfsg-1.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pgloader. The new version fixes a missing
run-time dependency on libssl1.0.2.
(Unfortunately there is a second SSL-related bug in pgloader via
cl-plus-ssl - when loading from MS SQL-Server, it is trying to call
SSLv3_client_method which was only part of libssl1.0.0 in jessie, but
is not present anymore in libssl1.0.2. This is #864363, fixed some
hours ago. pgloader will have this bug until recompiled against
cl-plus-ssl 20160421-2.
This could be accomplished by a binnmu, but I guess that means
cl-plus-ssl needs an unblock as well, and it was uploaded only after
the deadline. I guess we'll just wait for the next point release with
that, and downgrade #864363 to important.)
diff -Nru pgloader-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/changelog pgloader-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- pgloader-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2016-12-03 17:36:56.000000000 +0100
+++ pgloader-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2017-06-07 12:19:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+pgloader (3.3.2+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * pgloader: Add Depends: libssl1.0.2, dlopen()ed at runtime.
+ (Closes: #864309)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org> Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:19:48 +0200
+
pgloader (3.3.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fixes github issue 453 (Closes: #843555)
diff -Nru pgloader-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/control pgloader-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/control
--- pgloader-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/control 2016-11-20 17:02:18.000000000 +0100
+++ pgloader-3.3.2+dfsg/debian/control 2017-06-07 12:06:20.000000000 +0200
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Package: pgloader
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, freetds-dev
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, freetds-dev, libssl1.0.2
Description: extract, transform and load data into PostgreSQL
pgloader imports data from different kind of sources and COPY it into
PostgreSQL.
unblock pgloader/3.3.2+dfsg-1.1
Thanks,
Christoph
Reply to: