[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#864085: unblock: dnsmasq/2.76-5



Simon,

please let me know what would be the fixed version number and I'll issue
an update to dns-root-data to have "Breaks: dnsmasq (<<
<fixed_version>)".

Cheers,
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
Knot Resolver (https://www.knot-resolver.cz/) – secure, privacy-aware,
fast DNS(SEC) resolver

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 19:54, Simon Kelley wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/06/17 16:36, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> > 
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 09:58:44AM +0100, ? wrote:
> >> The dnsmasq package in testing has a serious problem when dns-root-data is
> >> installed, due to changes in the format of the dns-root-data files.
> >> The effect is to render dnsmasq unusable.
> > 
> > Bother.
> > 
> >> There are several serious bugs filed to this effect, but they should
> >> really be release-critical, eg 863896
> >>
> >> There are also several bugs in the DNSSEC validation code, which are fixed
> >> upstream, and really should be in stretch.
> >>
> >> Therefore, if we can get dnsmasq-2.77-1, currently in unstable, into Stretch,
> >> that would be a Good Thing. If not, it will need a point release.
> > 
> > The delta from testing to unstable right now is not really suitable this
> > late in the process. I would prefer a targetted fix through t-p-u.
> 
> I understand.
> 
> > 
> > However, I wonder if that format change in dns-root-data risks problems in
> > other packages. Ondřej, is there any advantage to reverting that (keeping
> > the RC fix for parse-root-anchors.sh)?
> > 
> 
> The patch to fix this in dnsmasq is at :
> 
> http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=44eb875a5ab2e3b862a6b2bc9fbbb919475d2107
> 
> (that regexp handles both old and new formats.)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Simon.
> 
> 


Reply to: