[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.



On Sat, Apr  1, 2017 at 15:24:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-med@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
> 
> Hello again,
> 
> as a follow-up to #858183, I looked at which other R Bioconductor
> packages were broken by R 3.3.3-1, and it seems that the previous round
> of binNMUs did not repair some of them.
> 
> Can you make the followig binNMUs ?
> 
> nmu r-bioc-rsamtools_1.26.1-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3." 
> nmu r-bioc-shortread_1.32.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3." 
> nmu r-bioc-variantannotation_1.20.2-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3." 
> nmu r-bioc-genomicalignments_1.10.0-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild for R 3.3.3." 
> 
> Note to debian-science: there are also R CRAN packages that fail with R
> 3.3.3, (r-cran-lubridate, r-cran-spam), but I am not yet sure if a
> binNMU is enough.
> 
binNMUs are not an acceptable way to deal with silent breakage.  If R
3.3.3-1 breaks reverse dependencies, it needs to not be co-installable
with them.

Cheers,
Julien


Reply to: