update for release notes
Tried to commit this directly, but permission problems. I guess I
don't have write access?
Index: en/whats-new.dbk
===================================================================
--- en/whats-new.dbk (revision 11433)
+++ en/whats-new.dbk (working copy)
@@ -396,23 +396,22 @@
<section id="cd">
<title>CDs, DVDs, and BDs</title>
<para>
-The official &debian; distribution now ships on 9 to 10 binary
+The official &debian; distribution now ships on 12 to 14 binary
<acronym>DVD</acronym>s <indexterm><primary>DVD</primary></indexterm>
-or 75 to 85 binary <acronym>CD</acronym>s
-<indexterm><primary>CD</primary></indexterm> (depending on the
-architecture) and 10 source <acronym>DVD</acronym>s or 59 source
-<acronym>CD</acronym>s. Additionally, there is a
+(depending on the architecture) and 12 source
+<acronym>DVD</acronym>s. Additionally, there is a
<emphasis>multi-arch</emphasis> <acronym>DVD</acronym>, with a subset
of the release for the <literal>amd64</literal> and
<literal>i386</literal> architectures, along with the source
code. &debian; is also released as Blu-ray
<indexterm><primary>Blu-ray</primary></indexterm>
-(<acronym>BD</acronym>) images, 2 each for the
-<literal>amd64</literal> and <literal>i386</literal> architectures, or
-2 for the source code. For size reasons, some very large packages
-are omitted from the <acronym>CD</acronym> builds; these packages fit
-better in the <acronym>DVD</acronym> and <acronym>BD</acronym> builds,
-so are still included there.
+(<acronym>BD</acronym>) and dual layer Blu-ray
+<indexterm><primary>dual layer Blu-ray</primary></indexterm>
+(<acronym>DLBD</acronym>) images for the <literal>amd64</literal> and
+<literal>i386</literal> architectures, and also for source
+code. &debian; used to be released as a very large set of
+<acronym>CD</acronym>s for each architecture, but with the &releasename;
+release these have been dropped.
</para>
</section>
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
Reply to: