[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#860528: marked as done (nmu: libev_1:4.22-1)



Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:43:00 +0000
with message-id <f6aa62e1-adc8-d8c4-e800-91c734e2cf81@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#860528: Acknowledgement (nmu: libev_1:4.22-1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #860528,
regarding nmu: libev_1:4.22-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
860528: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu libev_1:4.22-1 . ANY . jessie . -m "Rebuild to Close #860301"

I don't really understand what's going on...
bug reporter says it's fixed when rebuilt. So let's rebuild !

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jérémy Lal:
> 2017-04-18 11:32 GMT+02:00 Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
>> On 2017-04-18 10:15, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>>
>>> My mistake, i meant to ask a binNMU in testing/unstable
>>>
>>> nmu libev_1:4.22-1 . ANY . stretch . -m "Rebuild to Close #860301"
>>
>>
>> For a rebuild in unstable, that's still wrong, I'm afraid - just drop the "
>> . stretch", as unstable is the default.
> 
> Should the request be for unstable, and then an unblock request so it
> goes to stretch ?
> 
> I'm confused.
> Jérémy
> 

Just a binNMU request for unstable. binNMUs migrate automatically if
they can (e.g. same source version in unstable and testing).

I have scheduled the binNMU, but binNMUs cannot close bugs.  Please
verify that the binNMU works, appears in testing and then close the bug.

Thanks,
~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: