Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> writes: > Ok - as I understand it, what we are dealing with here is: > > * systemd: You can get gssproxy + NFS and it "just works(tm)" if > you install gssproxy. Otherwise you get svcgssd + NFS. > (This is how I understood Neil Brown) > * sysvinit: Business as usual either way. > > > So granting gssproxy will: > > * Provide systemd users with NFS + gssproxy if they opt-in to it > (by installing it) > * Provide sysvinit users gssproxy and if they want to use it with > NFS, they may have to tweak things themselves > * Not cause any issues for neither systemd users nor sysvinit users > just by installing it. > * enable users to get gssproxy which is not deprecated (unlike the > existing svcgssd) > > Is the above correct? And you are happy with gssproxy/0.5.1-2 as it is? That sounds right. And yes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature