Bug#857497: unblock: darktable/2.2.1-3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package darktable
this version (only) drops i386 binary packages
diff -Nru darktable-2.2.1/debian/changelog darktable-2.2.1/debian/changelog
- --- darktable-2.2.1/debian/changelog 2017-01-02 13:54:11.000000000 -0400
+++ darktable-2.2.1/debian/changelog 2017-03-10 13:41:38.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+darktable (2.2.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Drop support for 32bit intel (i386) architectures (Closes: #857147)
+ - Upstream no longer supports 32bit address spaces.
+ - The i386 build is reported to be unstable.
+
+ -- David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:41:38 -0400
+
darktable (2.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* re-re-enable arm64 (sigh)
diff -Nru darktable-2.2.1/debian/control darktable-2.2.1/debian/control
- --- darktable-2.2.1/debian/control 2017-01-02 13:54:11.000000000 -0400
+++ darktable-2.2.1/debian/control 2017-03-10 13:41:38.000000000 -0400
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-phototools/darktable.git;a=summary
Package: darktable
- -Architecture: any-i386 any-amd64 any-arm64
+Architecture: any-amd64 any-arm64
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libjs-prototype, libjs-scriptaculous
Replaces: darktable-plugins-legacy (<< 0.9), darktable-plugins-experimental (<< 1.0~)
Breaks: darktable-plugins-legacy (<< 0.9), darktable-plugins-experimental (<< 1.0~)
unblock darktable/2.2.1-3
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Yqu3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: