Bug#855258: unblock: spice/0.12.8-2.1

[Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>]

Hi James,

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:02:16PM +0000, James Cowgill wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:11:44 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
> <carnil@debian.org> wrote:
> > Hi Moarkus, hi Emilio,
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:50:34PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > > On 16.02.2017 22:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > > > 
> > > > On 16/02/17 06:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > >> Package: release.debian.org
> > > >> Severity: normal
> > > >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > >> Usertags: unblock
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi
> > > >>
> > > >> Please unblock package spice
> > > [...]
> > > > That failed to build on mips(64)el:
> > > > 
> > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=spice
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I think this is unrelated to our security fix. The package already
> > > failed on mips64el last month (2017/01/06) with the same build failure.
> > 
> > FTR, yes I think this is true, that the failure is *not* related to
> > the security fixes. I built both 0.12.8-2 and 0.12.8-2.1 on eller.d.o,
> > and it failed both there. I have not futher investigated.
> 
> The build failure was caused by the lesser form of the binutils bug
> (#844227 - scroll to the bottom) which has just been fixed. I rebuilt
> spice with an extra-depends on binutils and it now builds ok.

Thanks for the analysis!

Regards,
Salvatore