Hi Niels, 15.02.2017 22:48, Niels Thykier пишет: > To avoid any misunderstandings, #855004 need to be fixed before > swi-prolog/7.2.3+dfsg-6 can migrate. You probably already noticed, but > the FTP masters have requested a follow up from you. Does it mean that swi-prolog should be removed from testing in the first place and the bug should be closed, or the bug can be closed without removing? If removing is necessary, then what is the procedure to allow removed rdepends to migrate to testing back? Should I request unblock for them in this case? Thanks! Lev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature