[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package shotwell



On 02/13/2017 09:03 PM, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> Good to hear again from you regarding this package, Jörg!
> 
> On 02/13/2017 05:32 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 13/02/17 13:15, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a way to get the old version shotwell / 0.24.0-1 back in
>>> testing.
>>>
>>> The current version 0.25.1-1 is to buggy.
>>
>> Not surprising, given 0.25.x are from the development branch.
>>
>> There is #854912 asking to unblock 0.25.4. Going back to 0.24.x is another
>> option, but you would need to upload that with a higher version to sid (e.g.
>> 1:0.24.0-1)...
> 
> Given that it's a little late, I do propose to wait for 0.25.4 to be
> unblocked. After all, it's 7 days old and a new package would have to
> start again at 0.
> 
> Well, unless there're good reasons to do otherwise.

Now there is a reason: #854912 has been turned down.
I've just NMU'd 0.25.4+really0.24.5-0.1.
Hope that can get in now.

  -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>


Reply to: