Bug#854945: marked as done (unblock: lprng/3.8.B-2.1)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:30:00 +0100
with message-id <4d75fd7d-6975-bb1e-7b51-50d37075a8bf@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#854945: unblock: lprng/3.8.B-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #854945,
regarding unblock: lprng/3.8.B-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
854945: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854945
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lprng.
The NMU 3.8.B-2.1 fixes a bug where SSL support in the package was
silently dropped since OpenSSL 1.1 (#854468), because the configure
checks were looking for a deprecated library symbol, which is now
a preprocessor macro. The change restores SSL support by looking for
a different symbol.
Regards,
Reiner
unblock lprng/3.8.B-2.1
diff -Nru lprng-3.8.B/debian/changelog lprng-3.8.B/debian/changelog
--- lprng-3.8.B/debian/changelog 2012-06-11 10:07:15.000000000 +0200
+++ lprng-3.8.B/debian/changelog 2017-02-08 21:20:30.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+lprng (3.8.B-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Don't lose authentication support when compiled with OpenSSL 1.1, patch by
+ Reiner Herrmann <reiner@reiner-h.de> (Closes: #854468).
+
+ -- Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 21:20:30 +0100
+
lprng (3.8.B-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Compilies on hurd-i386 Closes: #671848
diff -Nru lprng-3.8.B/debian/patches/openssl_1.1.patch lprng-3.8.B/debian/patches/openssl_1.1.patch
--- lprng-3.8.B/debian/patches/openssl_1.1.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ lprng-3.8.B/debian/patches/openssl_1.1.patch 2017-02-08 21:19:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+--- a/configure.ac
++++ b/configure.ac
+@@ -1008,7 +1008,7 @@
+ SSL_LDADD="-L$dir $SSL_LDADD"
+ fi
+ LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS $SSL_LDADD"
+- AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC(SSL_load_error_strings,ac_linked_libssl="true",
++ AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC(OPENSSL_init_ssl,ac_linked_libssl="true",
+ ac_linked_libssl="false");
+ AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC(RC4_set_key,ac_linked_libcrypto="true",
+ ac_linked_libcrypto="false");
+--- a/configure
++++ b/configure
+@@ -10408,11 +10408,11 @@
+ #ifdef __cplusplus
+ extern "C"
+ #endif
+-char SSL_load_error_strings ();
++char OPENSSL_init_ssl ();
+ int
+ main ()
+ {
+-return SSL_load_error_strings ();
++return OPENSSL_init_ssl ();
+ ;
+ return 0;
+ }
diff -Nru lprng-3.8.B/debian/patches/series lprng-3.8.B/debian/patches/series
--- lprng-3.8.B/debian/patches/series 2012-06-11 08:49:05.000000000 +0200
+++ lprng-3.8.B/debian/patches/series 2017-02-08 21:19:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
lpd_conf_manwarnings
portable_maxpathlen
string_literals
+openssl_1.1.patch
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12/02/17 12:16, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package lprng.
>
> The NMU 3.8.B-2.1 fixes a bug where SSL support in the package was
> silently dropped since OpenSSL 1.1 (#854468), because the configure
> checks were looking for a deprecated library symbol, which is now
> a preprocessor macro. The change restores SSL support by looking for
> a different symbol.
>
> Regards,
> Reiner
>
> unblock lprng/3.8.B-2.1
lprng | 3.8.B-2.1 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
lprng | 3.8.B-2.1 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
Looks like this already migrated.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: