[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#853964: marked as done (unblock: sbsigntool/0.6-3.2)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:43:00 +0000
with message-id <66db01bb-dfa4-00b6-056a-10522e83e759@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#853964: unblock: sbsigntool/0.6-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #853964,
regarding unblock: sbsigntool/0.6-3.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
853964: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853964
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package sbsigntool

This fixes FTBFS with recent versions of binutils.

diff -Nru sbsigntool-0.6/debian/changelog sbsigntool-0.6/debian/changelog
--- sbsigntool-0.6/debian/changelog	2016-06-26 22:39:15.000000000 +0100
+++ sbsigntool-0.6/debian/changelog	2017-01-29 01:00:17.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+sbsigntool (0.6-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix linker flags for test cases (Closes: #842446)
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>  Sun, 29 Jan 2017 01:00:17 +0000
+
 sbsigntool (0.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload with approval of maintainer
diff -Nru sbsigntool-0.6/debian/patches/fix-linker-flags-for-test-cases.patch sbsigntool-0.6/debian/patches/fix-linker-flags-for-test-cases.patch
--- sbsigntool-0.6/debian/patches/fix-linker-flags-for-test-cases.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ sbsigntool-0.6/debian/patches/fix-linker-flags-for-test-cases.patch	2017-01-29 01:00:17.000000000 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+Author: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
+Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 00:25:50 +0000
+Description: Fix linker flags for test cases
+ We need to explicitly disable use of a dynamic linker.  When using
+ Debian's binutils 2.27-9, ld succeeds but appears to generate broken
+ headers that cause the tests to fail.  When using binutils 2.28, ld
+ fails, reporting "Not enough room for program headers, try linking
+ with -N".
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/842446
+
+--- a/tests/Makefile.am
++++ b/tests/Makefile.am
+@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ test-i386.pecoff: test_lds = $(srcdir)/t
+ test-i386.pecoff: ASFLAGS += -m32
+ test-i386.pecoff: LDFLAGS += -m32
+ 
+-test-%.elf: LDFLAGS = -nostdlib -T $(test_lds)
++test-%.elf: LDFLAGS = -nostdlib -T $(test_lds) -Wl,--no-dynamic-linker
+ test-%.elf: test-%.$(OBJEXT) $(test_lds)
+ 	$(LINK) $<
+ 
diff -Nru sbsigntool-0.6/debian/patches/series sbsigntool-0.6/debian/patches/series
--- sbsigntool-0.6/debian/patches/series	2016-06-26 21:55:38.000000000 +0100
+++ sbsigntool-0.6/debian/patches/series	2017-01-29 01:00:17.000000000 +0000
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
 sbsign_check_write_return.patch
 update-openssl-api-usage-to-support-openssl-1.1.patch
 fix-efi-arch-detection.patch
+fix-linker-flags-for-test-cases.patch
--- END ---

unblock sbsigntool/0.6-3.2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Ben Hutchings:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package sbsigntool
> 
> This fixes FTBFS with recent versions of binutils.
> 
> [...]

Unblocked, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: