Re: Draft for taging 32 RC bugs with can-defer, will-remove or is-blocker

To: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Draft for taging 32 RC bugs with can-defer, will-remove or is-blocker
From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:20:00 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 1ff202e8-b585-05e6-f2e1-ba7d69ecff20@thykier.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrno8pn4o.ecg.jmm@inutil.org>
References: <[🔎] a8fd9412-d370-e8e5-85e1-f7a736fb59f4@thykier.net> <[🔎] slrno8pn4o.ecg.jmm@inutil.org>

Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> schrieb:
>>> 852603	virglrenderer		can-defer	virglrenderer: CVE-2016-10163
>>> 852604	virglrenderer		can-defer	virglrenderer: CVE-2017-5580
> 
> This hasn't been in a stable release yet and it already orphaned. If noone
> picks it up or fixes it, let's rather remove it.
> 
> Cheers,
>         Moritz
> 

That indeed seems like a better solution given the context; I am putting
those down as "will-remove".

Thanks,
~Niels

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Draft for taging 32 RC bugs with can-defer, will-remove or is-blocker
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

References:
- Draft for taging 32 RC bugs with can-defer, will-remove or is-blocker
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Re: Draft for taging 32 RC bugs with can-defer, will-remove or is-blocker
  - From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: 0.11~beta4-1 -> 0.11-1
Next by Date: NEW changes in stable-new
Previous by thread: Re: Draft for taging 32 RC bugs with can-defer, will-remove or is-blocker
Next by thread: Re: Draft for taging 32 RC bugs with can-defer, will-remove or is-blocker
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread