[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#846786: transition: ldns (tiny pkg-dns self-contained transition)



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

there's an upcoming new release of ldns that is going to fix OpenSSL
1.1.0 RC bug (#846768).  Upstream has changed SOVERSION just in case
(there are few symbols that disappeared, but they were not used by
any downstream).

The number of involved packages is really small and self contained
within pkg-dns team (with sole exception of python-libtrace).

I hope this falls within "no new library transitions (or package
transitions) that involve a large number of packages.", since this
doesn't involve a large number of packages and it will help cleanup
the OpenSSL mess we now have a bit.

# binNMUable
dnscrypt-proxy # pkg-dns/eric
dnssec-trigger # pkg-dns/ondrej
dnstap-ldns # pkg-dns/eric
getdns # pkg-dns/ondrej,dkg
libnet-ldns-perl # pkg-dns/ondrej
opendnssec # pkg-dns/ondrej
python-libtrace # pkg-netmeasure/irl

# no-action needed, runtime depends
python-getdns: # pkg-dns/ondrej,dkg
sshfp # orphaned

Ben file:

title = "ldns";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libldns1" | .depends ~ "libldns2";
is_good = .depends ~ "libldns2";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libldns1";


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-41-generic (SMP w/24 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=u8jj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: