Re: migration exception for mhap
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 23:54:00 -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> For the people who hold the view that, if a package of
> architecture-independent files is not installable on i386, it should be
> duplicated for each of the architectures on which it will be
> installable, has this opinion taken the approval of the ftpmasters? I
> don't think they would be in favor of the idea of wasting space on the
> archive for this reason.
>
I think the view is mainly that asking that the package be made to work
on i386 is not all that big an ask, for something supposedly
arch-independent.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: