Bug#830966: transition: gdal

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>]

On 07/13/2016 04:18 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/07/16 13:32, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 2.1.1.
>>
>> Like the previous transition to GDAL 2.1.0 (#823335), there is no SONAME
>> bump, only the virtual ABI package changed to account for the C++ symbol
>> changes.
>>
>> All reverse dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 2.1.1 from
>> experimental as summarized below.
>>
>> libgdal-grass doesn't need a binNMU as the 2.1.1 version will be
>> uploaded to unstable instead. liblas likewise doesn't need a binNMU,
>> the version is experimental will be moved to unstable instead.
> 
> Go ahead.

Thanks for super quick response.

gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-1), liblas (1.8.0-11) & libgdal-grass (2.1.1-1) have
been uploaded to unstable and are currently being built.

I think we'll keep SAGA 2.3.1 in experimental until gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-1)
migrates to testing. Having the saga & merkaartor packages in
experimental binNMUed along with their counterparts in unstable is would
be very welcome.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1