Bug#829371: transition: ntl

To: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>, 829371@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#829371: transition: ntl
From: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:27:32 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1df6f597-b8d1-16d7-f16c-71e266274830@laposte.net>
Reply-to: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net>, 829371@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 908caaeef763a1f94df3eb6050a9b1db@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
References: <[🔎] 6dd19a43-f57b-b68b-7298-d8dc07b4bff3@laposte.net> <[🔎] 587f92b86fa205f49de235188163bf4e@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net> <[🔎] 908caaeef763a1f94df3eb6050a9b1db@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>

Hi,

On 04/07/2016 14:13, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

On 2016-07-03 10:30, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

Control: tag -1 confirmed

On 2016-07-02 21:58, Julien Puydt wrote:

I checked that these new ntl packages make it possible to build eclib,
flint, linbox, singular and flint-arb on an amd64 debian box, so I
don't expect any new problem.


Please go ahead.


Seems to have happened, so rebuilds scheduled.

I still follow things on the auto-ntl tracker, so I don't see ifanything happens with flint-arb : is it ok ?


Snark on #debian-science

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#829371: transition: ntl
  - From: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net>
- Bug#829371: transition: ntl
  - From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>
- Bug#829371: transition: ntl
  - From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release
Next by Date: Bug#829145: transition: glibc 2.23
Previous by thread: Bug#829371: transition: ntl
Next by thread: Bug#829371: transition: ntl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread