Bug#813916: transition: gdal
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 19/02/16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
>>>>> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt.
>>>>>
>>>>> GDAL 2.0.2 was released along with 1.11.4, but we still don't have
>>>>> support for GDAL 2.0 in all reverse dependencies. Since the transition
>>>>> to GDAL 1.11.3, support for GDAL 2.0 was added to all reverse
>>>>> depedencies except Fiona [0]. Upstream has recently included changes for
>>>>> GDAL 2.0, but these differ from the initial GDAL 2.0 changes available
>>>>> as a patch in #802808. The improved GDAL 2.0 changes are entangled with
>>>>> other changes for the upcoming Fiona 1.7 release, which I've not been
>>>>> able to successfully backport. This will not be a blocker for the GDAL
>>>>> 2.0 transition, as discussed with the maintainer on the debian-gis list
>>>>> [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> Because the transition for GDAL 1.11.4 is ready now, I'd like to do that
>>>>> first before preparing the transition to GDAL 2.0. All reverse
>>>>> dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 1.11.4, the summary of
>>>>> rebuilds is included below.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This would get entangled with the openmpi transition, so it will have to wait.
>>>> After openmpi, I'm thinking about doing libpng, but we'll see.
>>>
>>> Waiting for openmpi is no problem, but if the libpng transition is going
>>> to happen first, I think it's better to use that time the prepare the
>>> transition to GDAL 2.0 instead of 1.11.4. Last week the last blocker was
>>> resolved [0], so we're also pretty much ready to transition to GDAL 2.0.
>>> The 2.0 packages will have to pass the NEW queue again, because of the
>>> delay that will cause I've opted to transition to 1.11.4 which is ready now.
>>>
>>> If you can confirm that the libpng transition is going to happen first,
>>> I'll upload the packages for GDAL 2.0 to experimental, and we can switch
>>> to that in unstable after the libpng transition and the new gdal has
>>> passed NEW.
>>
>> Sure, let's do that.
>
> The GDAL 2.0.2 packages are available in experimental and ready for
> transition.
>
> libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1) not available in experimental yet, liblas and
> grass need to be rebuilt with GDAL 2.0 before it can be built too,
> because the SOVERSION is included in the binary package it builds the
> package will have to pass the NEW queue after upload first. To get it
> passed the NEW queue, I'll rebuild liblas & grass with gdal
> (2.0.2-1-1~exp2) from experimental and upload all three to experimental too.
>
> All reverse dependencies build successfully with GDAL 2.0.
>
>
> Transition: gdal
>
> libgdal1i (1.11.3+dfsg-3) -> libgdal20 (2.0.2+dfsg-1)
> libgdal.so.1-1.11.3 -> gdal-abi-2-0-2
>
> The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
>
> dans-gdal-scripts (0.23-4) OK
> fiona (1.6.3-2) OK
> gazebo (6.5.0+dfsg-2) OK
> gmt (5.2.1+dfsg-3) OK
> imposm (2.6.0+ds-2) OK
> libcitygml (2.0-1) OK
> liblas (1.8.0-7) OK
> libosmium (2.6.0-1) OK
> mapcache (1.4.0-4) OK
> mapnik (3.0.9+ds-1) OK
> mapserver (7.0.0-9) OK
> merkaartor (0.18.2-5) OK
> mysql-workbench (6.3.4+dfsg-3) OK
> ncl (6.3.0-6) OK
> node-srs (0.4.8+dfsg-2) OK
> openscenegraph (3.2.1-9) OK
> osmium (0.0~20160124-b30afd3-1) OK
> osrm (4.9.1+ds-1~exp2) OK
> postgis (2.2.1+dfsg-2) OK
> pprepair (0.0~20150624-82a2019-1) OK
> prepair (0.7-4) OK
> qlandkartegt (1.8.1+ds-4) OK
> qmapshack (1.5.1-1) OK
> rasterio (0.31.0-2) OK
> saga (2.2.3+dfsg-1) OK
> sumo (0.25.0+dfsg1-2) OK
> thuban (1.2.2-9) OK
> vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1-7) OK
> xastir (2.0.6-4) OK
>
> grass (7.0.3-1) OK
> osgearth (2.5.0+dfsg-8 / 2.7.0+dfsg-1~exp5) OK / OK
> osmcoastline (2.1.2-1) OK
> pktools (2.6.6-1) OK
> pyosmium (2.6.0-1) OK
>
> libgdal-grass (1.11.3-3 / 2.0.2-1) FTBFS / OK
> qgis (2.8.6+dfsg-1) OK
I guess https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html is better
than https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal-1.11.4.html now?
Let's do this.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: