Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:17:46 +0100 with message-id <56D5DCCA.8020301@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#814367: transition: x265 has caused the Debian Bug report #814367, regarding transition: x265 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 814367: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: x265
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:45:27 +0100
- Message-id: <20160210214527.GA23619@ramacher.at>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html It's this time of the year again. libx265 bumped its SONAME and requires a transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version which is waiting in experimental. Cheers Ben file: title = "x265"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libx265-68" | .depends ~ "libx265-76"; is_good = .depends ~ "libx265-76"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libx265-68"; -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>, 814367-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#814367: transition: x265
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:17:46 +0100
- Message-id: <56D5DCCA.8020301@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20160210214527.GA23619@ramacher.at>
- References: <20160210214527.GA23619@ramacher.at>
On 10/02/16 22:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html > > It's this time of the year again. libx265 bumped its SONAME and requires a > transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version > which is waiting in experimental. This was waiting for gst-plugins-bad1.0 to migrate, which just happened this morning. Cheers, Emilio
--- End Message ---