On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:56:27PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 30/01/16 19:18, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We want to ship ruby2.3 in stretch, so we must start the transition now.
> > The Ruby transitions are done in phases, as described in
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/InterpreterTransitions
> >
> > We are now in phase 1: I have just uploaded ruby-defaults enabling
> > builds against ruby2.3 (besides ruby2.2) to experimental, and we will
> > start test rebuilds ASAP. I am filing this bug now to keep this
> > transition under the radar of both the Release and Ruby teams.
> >
> > Ben file:
> >
> > title = "ruby2.3";
> > is_affected = .depends ~ "libruby2.2" | .depends ~ "libruby2.3";
> > is_good = .depends ~ "libruby2.3";
> > is_bad = ! .depends ~ "libruby2.3";
> >
> > Note about the ben file statements above: at this stage, packages will
> > gain ruby2.3 support but won't lose support for ruby2.2, so "bad"
> > packages are indeed just the ones that don't have ruby2.3 support yet.
> >
> > I will let you know when we are ready to begin rebuilds on unstable, but
> > before even uploading ruby-defaults enabling ruby2.3 builds there.
>
> OK.
>
> I have created a tracker for you at:
>
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.3.html
I would like to add support for building for ruby2.3 in unstable. That
means uploading the version of ruby-defaults in experimental to
unstable.
The number of FTBFS in arch:any packages against ruby2.3 support is fairly small:
libguestfs
remctl
ruby-blockenspiel
ruby-fssm
ruby-gsl
ruby-kakasi-ffi
ruby-monkey-lib
ruby-mysql2
ruby-oj
ruby-rjb
ruby-zoom
zeroc-ice
I'll make sure to report bugs against those packages before uploading
ruby-defaults. Once ruby-defaults is uploaded, I already have a list of
packages to binNMU.
Also, could you please drop the "lib" prefixes from the ben file? I
noted that some packages depend directly on the interpreter packages
("rubyX.Y"), so we also need to track those.
For the Ruby team: I am tracking these rebuilds at
https://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rebuilds/ruby2.3/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature