[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#814595: marked as done (nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5)



Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:59:00 +0100
with message-id <56BF0C74.9080800@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814595: nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #814595,
regarding nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814595: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814595
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5 . mips . unstable . -m "Rebuild with liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5."

Looks like this was built against the temporarily reinstated liblttoolbox3-3.3-0.

apertium builds a M-A:same library, so maybe more architectures than
just mips should be rebuilt.


Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 13/02/16 11:32, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5 . mips . unstable . -m "Rebuild with liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5."
> 
> Looks like this was built against the temporarily reinstated liblttoolbox3-3.3-0.

Scheduled.

> apertium builds a M-A:same library, so maybe more architectures than
> just mips should be rebuilt.

Shrug.

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: