[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#811207: marked as done (transition: libcutl)

Your message dated Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:52:48 +0100
with message-id <56B381E0.7060605@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#811207: transition: libcutl
has caused the Debian Bug report #811207,
regarding transition: libcutl
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
811207: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Mini-transition of libcutl. It has 1.8 soname in Sid and 1.9 in
experimental, but I plan to upload soname 1.10 version. May I upload
it directly to Sid or should I target experimental first?
The only affected binary is odb which can be binNMUed. Libraries are
co-installable.

Ben file:

title = "libcutl;
is_affected = .depends ~ "libcutl-1.8" | .depends ~ "libcutl-1.9" | .depends ~ "libcutl-1.10";
is_good = .depends ~ "libcutl-1.10";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libcutl-1.8" | .depends ~ "libcutl-1.9";

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 18/01/16 15:16, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2016-01-18 13:23, László Böszörményi wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-16 20:17, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>>>> [...], but I plan to upload soname 1.10 version. May I upload
>>>> it directly to Sid or should I target experimental first?
>>>> The only affected binary is odb which can be binNMUed. Libraries are
>>>> co-installable.
>>>
>>> If you have tested odb and it builds correctly with the new library, you may
>>> upload directly to sid.
>>  Yes, of course I've tested odb and it built correctly. Uploaded
>> libcutl 1.10 to Sid and built / installed on all primary
>> architectures; expect mips where it's still scheduled.
> 
> Thanks, scheduled with --extra-depends.

This seems to be over. Closing.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: